Universal security and privacy automation
Protect data and manage risk
Analyze conversational chat data
Reduce the time and cost to comply
Self-service without friction or delay
Align data protection and business use
Tailor access controls and data privacy
Flexible, consistent, scalable
Automate actionable compliance steps
Who we integrate with
Our professional services
Power responsible use
From clinical to commercial
Optimize data tests
Open new revenue streams
Realize the potential of the cloud
Protect data from misuse
Transform your data
Opinion and industry insights
An A to Z of the industry
The podcast for data leaders
The latest compliance news and advice
Press releases, awards, and more
Staying at the cutting edge
The team behind Privitar
A thriving partner ecosystem
Our story, values, and careers
Dedicated customer assistance
Jul 19, 2016
John Taysom, Privitar co-founder and investor, took part recently in the Oxford Union Technological Privacy Debate.
The Motion: This House Believes Technology Companies Should Prevent Government Access to Consumers’ Data.
John Taysom argued the case for the Proposition, as the third speaker of six in the debate.
The government should not get access to my data as a matter of course. Or any consumer data. The government has a right to know who you are. Because they protect you and they tax you. And that’s the social contract that we make with our elected representatives. But the government has no right to know what you like, or what you buy or which way you might vote. Except in the abstract properly anonymised and for the purpose of driving evidence-based public policy formation.
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.
Our experts are ready to answer your questions and discuss how Privitar’s security and privacy solutions can fuel your efficiency, innovation, and business growth.