Self-service access to safe data
Protect data and manage risk
Analyze conversational chat data
Right data in the right hands
Align control and business use
Controlled access to data
Flexibility, consistency, scalability
Our professional services
Power responsible use
From clinical to commercial
Optimize data tests
Open new revenue streams
Realize the potential of the cloud
Protect data from misuse
Transform your data
Opinion and industry insights
An A to Z of the industry
The podcast for data leaders
Press releases, awards, and more
Staying at the cutting edge
The team behind Privitar
A thriving partner ecosystem
Our story, values, and careers
Dedicated customer assistance
Jan 23, 2018
It’s easy to see how data protection can be a source of frustration. The ‘big data’ vision that puts innovation within easy reach for data science, R&D and customer experience promises:
But privacy concerns often stand in the way of users getting fast access to the data they need. Here are three data provisioning scenarios that we often encounter:
That’s not exactly the transformational big data world that we’ve been promised.
When you compare the big data ‘promise’ to the analytics reality described above, it’s easy to blame the execution gap on privacy, and think of it as an inhibitor to progress. But that would be a significant mistake for any organisation, for several reasons:
Privacy is a fundamental right that we can’t ignore. Big data can be attacked in new ways (such as linkage, or tracker attacks), and organisations have a responsibility to protect the sensitive information of the customer and employee data that they’re processing. This is bigger than any one data user’s frustration, and we need to take it seriously. No-one can predict what consequence a leaked data point may have on an individual’s life, now or in the future. In an increasingly digital world, a responsible approach to privacy earns us the right to do business.
It gives analytics and machine intelligence a bad rep. Consumers are taking a more active interest in privacy practices, and are becoming increasingly worried about data abuse, including profiling and surveillance. If anything, data-processing organisations need to send a clear signal that they’re actively protecting their customers’ data. Increasing consumer distrust will damage businesses ‘ not to mention all of the organisations who are looking to use data for good, but rely on people contributing their personal data (such as NGOs and health researchers).
Protecting private data isn’t a problem. Context is everything. For most of the data processing lifecycle, analysts don’t require personal data, nor do they need to over-centralise sensitive data stores. Organisations can gain highly valuable insight with privacy-preserving mechanisms in place. If we keep thinking of successful analytics in terms of ‘privacy vs innovation’, we’re creating a false dichotomy.
Data provisioning today is often slow, tedious, and unsatisfactory. While the tools to analyse data have evolved, the tools to protect it have not. Organisations that leverage technology-driven privacy controls and modern privacy practices can significantly reduce the friction in these processes, and improve data availability and utility while preserving and building consumer trust.
So what should the privacy practices of a responsible, modern, analytics-driven organisation look like? Here are a few thoughts:
Data privacy is broader than technological controls alone. But combined with the right expertise and process changes, a comprehensive approach to privacy can give organisations the competitive edge.
I believe that taking a systematic and holistic approach enables us to quantify and balance privacy and data utility in order to both accelerate innovation and exceed customer expectations. It’s the only way forward.
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.
Our team of data security and privacy experts are here to answer your questions and discuss how modern data provisioning can fuel business growth.